Standings After First Tournament – Revised

With help of a few fellow debaters who detected sime mistakes, I was able to eliminate irregularities that had skneaked into the first version of the standings of the DLE. I guess that these are hick-ups that happen in something is new. The changes include: In the speaker tab of the DLE, speakers with the same amount of speaker points in the SOAS IV tab got the the same amount of speaker points in the DLE speaker tab. Speakers who are not students are now excluded. A similar rule holds true for the team standings, where all teams with no student in it got taken off the tab. That does not mean, that the other teams and speakers move up in points.
If you find more things that ought to be corrected, please inform me in the comments! Thanks a lot.

Note:  If a debating society has more than one teams in the top ten, only the first team will get points. The other teams get no points, but they still “block” the points for the other competing teams. If a team is made up of people who are not students, the same holds true.

The ranking for individual speakers

Advertisements

The standings after the first tournament

After the first tournament if over, the Debating League of Europe has its first official standings. Not surpisingly, they reflect closely the results of the first tournament.

Next weekend it’s going to get more interesting, when we will incorporate the results of the UCU Open.

Note:  If a debating society has more than one teams in the top ten, only the first team will get points. The other teams get no points, but they still “block” the points for the other competing teams.

The ranking for individual speakers

See you next weekend in Utrecht!

 

DLE starts at SOAS IV

This weekend it starts. Seven countries, seven capitals, seven tournaments, one League: The Debating League of Europe. (Well, technically it’s six capitals plus Utrecht, but let’s consider the Netherlands one giant urban area for a moment.) With the DLE, the European debating circuit gets what the circuit has almost become already anyway: A cohesive debating scene where debaters from all over Europe regularly meet and mingle. The league provides a common framework for keeping track of results of chosen tournaments across Europe.

The DLE is open for participation for every debating society in Europe. Every debater can be part of that European sense of belonging. But besides the benefits for the European idea and the fact that all participants gain a lot, we also have old-fashioned incentives. At the end of the season, there are two winners: A society that wins the league and a speaker who wins the DLE speaker tab – in open break and in ESL.

Both – best societies and best speakers – will be honored during the opening ceremony of the European Universities Debating Championships. The honorary guest will award them with the prize they’ve earned. That stage and the greater European debating scene are potentially open to every society. The only thing to do is: Take part in the tournaments. And if you like it competitive: Be good in them!

The tournaments to be visited in the first year are spread across Europe. The first step is taken by the SOAS IV in London , followed by: Utrecht Open, Trinity IV in Dublin, Vienna IV from Austria, Paris IV, the Belgrade Open and the Berlin IV. The Plan of the League can be accessed here. In the second season, the DLE will probably consist of even more tournaments. For more details, please take a look at the tentative tournament schedule. We hope, that this league makes funding for societies easier in terms of visiting these tournaments. Moreover we hope that the League brings high quality debating into the last corner of Europe.

We know that at the first glance it seems hard for every debating society to visit every tournament. This is why the tournaments are located in capitals: usually those are easy to access for everyone and worth a visit anyway. Further, it is important to emphasize that the teams that gather points for a society can consist of different people at each tournament. Thus the travel expenses can be distributed between many. Thirdly, there is no need participate in every tournament to win the league – 66% are enough. And last of all: With a little luck and some help, the EU might find this project worth funding. We are exploring that possibility right now. If somebody has hints or advice regarding that: Please do contact Marcus Ewald!

There are other advantages

All the rankings and reports about the tournaments and the current standings will be published here.

Along with the numbers and tabs you will be able to find background information and links to all important resources of the European debating scene.
European debating long has longed for a cohesive scene. This league makes that possible. By creating a number of tournaments that matter. Please support this idea, since it has the potential to create a truly European sense of belonging.